Category Archives: Criticism

Raiders of the Lost Art

Here’s a stroll down memory lane. I’m out of town, visiting a friend and house sitting when my buddy turns to me and asks, “Would you like to play a game?”

From the next room comes the massive box and I’m left wondering what I agreed to as a great board and numerous chits are scattered before me. There’s the frantic scratches of some forgotten general faded beneath the columns of spacious squares. He hands me a deck of cards.

“This is called Summoner Wars.”

I was playing the Sand Goblins, though that didn’t mean anything to me at the time. I can’t remember who he played. I want to say it was the Benders. All I know is that he taught me the game wrong, something I only learned later that night when I went online to check what other factions were in this strange but wonderful game.

I’m pretty sure I lost, by the way.

Summoner Wars Alliances belongs to Plaid Hat Games. It can be found at www.plaidhatgames.com/games/summoner-wars/

Summoner Wars belongs to Plaid Hat Games. It can be found at www.plaidhatgames.com/games/summoner-wars/

And I’ve been keeping that tradition strong ever since.

The losing with the Sand Goblins, not the obsessive online researching. Though, hm, maybe I’ve kept up with both.

Anyway, I’ve always liked the little Sand Goblins. This was before I learned they were suppose to be really good. Bolstered by the fact that providence had delivered me a great faction, I pulled them out against hapless victim after victim.

And I got trounced each time.

I don’t know why, but I simply can’t get these critters to do anything. They’re good. I can see that. I look at them and recognize that they’re good. But they just don’t work for me no matter what strategy I try.

My sister was the same way. In our first tournament, the Sand Goblins were second last, just beating the Cloaks but failing to edge out the Mountain Vargath. Our games outside our little tournaments continued this trend. The Sand Goblins just weren’t clicking for whatever reason. Chalk it up to personality differences or something.

Then the Big Ticket Tournament happened. Everything we thought we knew turned out to be wrong. The little goblins that could rose right up to third place, displacing some personal favourites from the tournament. Tacullu and Tundle were just several victims of these desert raiders. Even more shocking was that they rode this wave solely on my sister’s back. I didn’t get a single win with them and kept choosing their opponent expecting their “lucky streak” to break.

Even more baffling is that this faction isn’t well geared for the headlong rushing that my sister adores. I can’t explain it. I wish I could. I can’t tell if this is evidence of my sister’s good fortune or my bad luck. I’m certainly not going to attribute it to Kait’s strategic skill, that’s for sure!

sum-Krusk-Sand-GoblinsKrusk (2R-6W-Sandstorm)

Krusk is, I dare say, pretty average. Baseline statistics, average ability, ranged attack. It’s all nothing extraordinary. His ability is a decent 3 spaces and his events are global, so Krusk is going to skulk his back line just like any other typical summoner. He’s kind of forgettable back there and I certainly have a tendency to neglect his ability during a match.

But let’s talk about sandstorm.

At 2 magic, it’s not the cheapest thing on the block. I complained about Endrich’s geopathic command for costing 1 magic. This is twice as expensive. It’s limited by the same range though Krusk has a bit more health so him being in risk of receiving a hit or two isn’t going to end your game. You can target both enemies and allies, however, and it’s a bit of utility in that it can both move and damage targets. Granted, if you’re using it on your own units, you won’t be too happy about that self-harming bit.

It can get a unit into position or even finish off a trooper to deny your opponent the magic. Best case scenario is shifting an enemy into a firing lane and getting a hit on them but at 2 magic, you’re really not going to use this ability unless it’s going to have a major game effecting play.

Personally, I’m not a huge fan but I can recognize its niche use. It’s fine in the sense that a summoner and his deck don’t rely upon their ability. Endrich proved that.

Krusk’s events are a bit of a mixed bag as well. I resent Shiny. I’ve tried to get some use from it but not only is it hard to set-up but your opponent has full control over whether it can trigger at all or not. But we’ll get into how truly bad Shiny is when we discovered the much maligned scavenger. Suffice to say, it’s a bum event and basically just two magic in the deck.

Duck and Cover is interesting only because it’s so situational. It’s a powerful ability, granting conceal to all your Sand Goblins. However, it means absolutely nothing if you’re not facing an enemy that relies heavily on ranged units. It also does nothing if you’ve mostly got a bunch of javelineers on the field – a rather common occurrence if you’re facing an enemy that relies heavily on ranged units. I can’t recall a single use of it that has ever truly impacted a game. I can’t even recall it every being used to be honest. It’s seemingly a good card that’s kind of bad.

The one of is Mirage and this can be quite a powerful card. Not only does this rescue your summoning points if the game has gone completely sideways but it can also convert an early fortification into an aggressive forward barrier. It’s almost always better later than earlier, however, but we’ve had some game changing mirage plays. It’s also an event that your opponent is apt to forget since moving walls aren’t really a consideration in most match ups.

Finally, there is Taunt. I suspect this is the key to Kait’s success. I could never really get a good taunt off. Mostly because whenever I’m playing the goblins, all Kait’s commons are already adjacent to my units. Shuffling them around never seems like a necessary action. However, Kait always seems to taunt my boosted geopaths or controllers into the midst of her ranks to murder them wholesale.

The ability to move enemies and move them quite a distance is really strong and is hands down Krusk’s best event. You’ll likely be playing both of these even as the rest of your events go to the garbage. They alone are the reason I won’t say his suite is bad even if the others don’t pull their weight.

com-JavelineerJavelineer (1R-2W-1M-Camouflage)

So, this is a common.

What’s there to say about Javelineers? I suppose we can start off with how 1 range attack is pretty poor. I mean, that’s the same damage as a Gunner. And those girls are awful. Oh, but the Javelineer is 2 health so they would win an exchange with a gunner. Oh, and the gunner can’t attack them in the first place without giving up their ranged attack because of camouflage.

Oh. These guys are actually pretty awesome.

They basically shut out all ranged commons single handedly. And they’re cheap, cheap, cheap. Two health on a range unit is rare and you won’t be finding it on a 1 magic unit anywhere else. The idea is that ranged units are more fragile since they get to make the first attack against their opponent. Granted, these guys do nothing against melee units but their high health can make exchanges possible against your cheap attackers. Do keep in mind that a 1 magic melee unit is likely to have the same stats.

Only downside is that one attack is abysmal against melee champions that’ll just eat these guys for breakfast. But, I mean, they’re a freaking 1 magic common!

com-Scavenger

I’m not entirely sure what the Sand Goblins are even scavenging from a lot of cards. And how does the body of a magically conjured phoenix help prevent a goblin from being hurt the Filth’s Her from looking at them? Truly, they move in mysterious ways.

Scavenger (1M-2W-1M-Scavenge)

Ugh, scavengers.

These are the guys that made me originally comment on Plaid Hat creating all their decks with an unplayable unit who exists solely for magic fuel. I mean, I can see what they’re going for but the little jerks certainly do not do what they’re suppose to do.

So, see, it’s clear that scavengers were meant to be the core unit of a Sand Goblin army. The idea would be that they’d run around “scavenging” (please, Plaid Hat, hire a creative designer) and build up a bunch of shields to make them tanky. Then, Krusk would play Shiny and now you’ve got a bunch of 3 attack units that can’t be hurt smashing in your face.

But what do scavengers actually do?

Well, first, you aren’t going to be getting an army of them because they stifle your economy. You aren’t just killing enemy units to clear them off the board, you’re killing them because they give you a magic to use for summoning. Ever piece of “whatever” a scavenger scavenges is a point of magic that you can’t use to summon more scavengers, javelineers or shamans.

Second, these guys are natively one attack. So unless they’re facing the Cloaks, chances are they’re going to need other units to soften their target up for them to try and get their kill. They’re certainly not going to be eliminating the enemy’s forces without the use of shiny but they need to kill things in order for shiny to work. So you need the magic they’re denying in order to play the units that will let them kill the units that let them shiny and kill the enemy’s units.

Third, you get no benefit from shiny until after an enemy’s turn has passed. Unfortunately, there is no “may” in the scavenge ability. Whenever the enemy would place one or more wounds on your scavenger you must discard his scavenged shield. So this ability isn’t even making the guys particularly durable since the enemy can first attack with a low attack unit to peel off the shiny then attack with the high attack unit to kill the scavenger. Or, you know, he can just hit the scavenger once and remove the scavenged shield thus making your shiny in hand completely useless.

It’s incredibly easy to tell when Krusk is attempting to set up a shiny turn and trivially easily to stop it. Either Krusk can stuff his hand with the shiny hoping to pull it off eventually or give up on the attempt that’s already burning him potential magic with the kills he’s been setting up with the scavengers. Oh, and scavengers don’t even get a choice of whether they scavenge or not so whenever you play them to the field you’re running the risk of losing that kill’s magic.

Build them for magic and complain to Plaid Hat about how bad they are. Even a simple “may” in their ability would do wonders for them though I don’t even know I’d still play them in that circumstance (wherever they place that may in the ability).

com-ShamanShaman (2R-1W-1M-Escape)

Shamans rock. There’s not much else to say.

Alright, I’ll say a little more. But it should be evident to anyone that’s read a prior review. Though, really, at this point it should be evident even if you’ve only read this review. Two range attack for one magic is very, very good. And the shaman isn’t even burdened with a negative ability to get this very, very good stat line. Granted, if you start using escape then you’re not really getting that cost discount but you aren’t forced to use it and it can be helpful to block or clear lanes. Remember, the Cloaks are spending an extra magic to get this ability on one of their champions.

Granted, buying cost effective stats isn’t particularly sexy so I can understand why no one would be getting excited over them. But wowie, are these guys silly good.

chm-BiterBiter (3M-6W-4M-Crazed)

Every now and then I’ll mention a deck’s theme. Often this was an overarching design philosophy that shaped the design of the cards. It’s a central idea which each individual piece taps into in some way. The Mountain Vargath were herbivorous bruisers – hard hitting, aggressive bullies who herded together to make themselves stronger. Deep Benders were a fusion of Deep Dwarf economic efficiency with the Bender’s trick of mimicry.

So what’s the Sand Goblins shtick? Well, I think they were meant to follow some sort of racial profile. The Cave Goblins are all about a tide of cheap bodies that rush their opponent. The Sand Goblins seem to forego the rushing element and decide to supplement their strategy with toughness but they seem to still tap into that goblin characteristic of being priced well below their peers.

So… yeah. Look at Biter. He is a whole 2 magic cheaper than you’d expect a champion with 3 melee and 6 health. He’s actually the same price as the Swamp Orc savager and Jungle Elf jungle guard who have 3 melee/3 health and 1 range/4 health respectively. That’s bananas.

To offset this discount, Biter does come with a negative ability. Crazed means that every enemy unit has a free engaged ability. It’s going to be hard wiggling this bloodthirsty goblin onto the enemy summoner as he stops to stab everything that he passes on the way. A wily summoner can keep him at bay, chipping through that health pool to bring him down. A wily Krusk has to play around his disadvantage to wield this powerhouse to his advantage. This is where that sandstorm comes in. You can clear the way for Biter with that two magic discount and get him after the enemy summoner. Even if he ends up dying on an opponent’s champion, chances are you’ll be able to take out his opponent as well and its likely that you got the better deal in that economic exchange.

Yeah, Biter is great. It’s hard to not make a deck without him. A common with a literal stat line of a champion is well worth the negative he comes with. Biter is awesome.

chm-KreepKreep (3M-6W-4M-Cowardly)

The Sand Goblins have two Biters in their deck?! How is that fair?

It’s not. This is why the Sand Goblins are pretty good. Their commons are cheap and powerful, allowing you to apply pressure with marginal tax on your economy. Then, when you draw your champions, you can throw them to the field to wreck faces. It’s a wonder that I don’t ever win with them.

I mean, four magic for a champion means that you can have the magic to play him in your first draw even as you pick him up!

That said, Kreep isn’t as good as Biter. Whereas Biter’s negative is he gets stuck with any old unit the enemy throws beside him, Kreep gets skittish if he’s left staring in an enemy’s eyes. Sure, it’s only a 1 in 3 chance that he’ll run off but there’s no worse feeling than rolling a pair of misses on a two health common then rolling a 2 on Kreep’s morale check and watching your fresh 4/6 champion scamper off to your discard pile.

Kreep is also significantly worse against champions than Biter. Those beefy targets can trigger morale checks multiple times. It’s also much harder to protect Kreep since your options to pull him away from opponents after his attacks are extremely limited. You really need to count on Kreep not missing whenever he steps up to the plate.

He’s ok and as a duo with Biter he’s fantastic. But he’s the kind of champion that you often want to ensure that he has backup. It’s a fantastic marriage of mechanics and theme, I’ll give them that.

chm-SiltsSilts (2M-6W-7M-Cunning)

Last but not least is Silts. Silts almost makes up for the discount on Kreep and Biter. Almost. His stats are actually less than you’d expect for a 6 magic champion and he costs one more. That said, his ability is definitely worth 2 magic.

Cunning has a rare trigger, letting you exchange places with a target whenever you want during your turn. And this is literally at any time. You can move one space, exchange and keep moving. You can attack with a shaman, exchange places between Silts and the enemy and let even more of your ranged army hit the poor victim.

Hell, you can make an exchange before you draw cards if you so desired, you maverick you.

And Silts can move any unit. Conjurations, summoners, champions, commons: it doesn’t matter, Silts will move with them all. This can pull Biter from some blocking weenies. This can yank Kreep away from a terrifying cowardice check. Silts can open lanes, block lanes, expose flanks and generally sow confusion and discord wherever he goes.

That said, 7 magic is a steep cost and 6 health doesn’t hold up well. Cunning protects him from reprisal with clever swaps, though, so if you’re clever you can get a lot of mileage out of this little goblin. But expect a lot of hate to come his way. He’s a more situational summon and though his ability is fantastic, it is hardly necessary. You can build him out for other options and not feel like you’re cutting off your arm in the process.

So, yeah. Here we are with the third worst of the Master Set group and the deck isn’t really that bad at all. There’s a lot of powerful cards in here, a fact my sister proved when she took the Sand Goblins to third place in the major showdown. They’ve got some tricks to them and some strong answers to things that are thrown their way.

That said, their path to victory isn’t assured and it feels like you have to play this weird back and forth game with the Sand Goblins. You’re looking to coerce the opponent into having to spend their magic inefficiently, using double or more their resources to take out your more cost effective options. They don’t have a lot of answers if someone puts them on the defensive, however. Nor are they particularly great at rushing an enemy so if the opponent has a better late game, it’s going to be tricky breaking those defences.

And though they rarely seem to co-operate with me, I still look on them fondly as the plucky little desert weirdos that got me into this strange game.

Moo, I say

Sometimes we like things that we shouldn’t. Children can’t get enough of ice cream. Americans can’t get enough Adam Sandler. My sister can’t play enough Mountain Vargath.

Continuing my review of some older Summoner Wars decks, I come to an important transition point. Last week, I covered the abysmally performing Cloaks and their feeble line of champions and commons. This week I’ll be looking at the mountain goats. Both of these factions are notable for two reasons. One, they have a consistent low performance across tournaments. Second, they’re both near and dear to our hearts.

evt-FallBackThe Mountain Vargath had an equally poor showing as the Cloaks. They claimed two victories in our Master Set tournament. They claimed nothing in the Kitchen Sink Combat. The only reason they edge out the Cloaks is because one of their two victories was against the hapless rebels. And… well… someone had to be on the bottom and frankly the Cloaks have an overall worse deck than the Vargath.

But after these two we actually start entering murky waters. The nice thing about the goats and rebels is that they are clearly, distinctly terrible. When calculating a rough ranking for these factions to decide how I’d post them, most of the factions were fairly close. But the Cloaks and Mountain Vargath were half the ranking of their peers. No matter who played them or how we approached the decks, these two factions kept falling on their faces. For the Cloaks, we could see that pretty much every option they had to field for battle was both brittle and underwhelming.

But the Mountain Vargath are oddly the opposite. There’s not a single 1 health unit in their ranks. They actually have access to two attack commons fairly effortlessly. And their champions aren’t quite as terrible as the Cloaks.

So what went wrong?

I’ve discussed before the difficulties of aggression in Summoner Wars. There’s inherent design that makes charging across the battlefield to combat your opponent a noticeably weaker strategy than sitting back and waiting for the enemy to come to you. Most of the factions that are effective at aggression have some advantage to match the ability to instantaneously reinforce and surround an attacking force.

I believe the Mountain Vargath were the first faction to try and address this. Looking at their numbers, they’re kind of insane. Unfortunately, in order to leverage their advantage, the Mountain Vargath kind of reveal new issues that being aggressive hadn’t revealed before. I think, in their attempt to fix one problem, the designers stumbled into other ones.

sum-Sunderved

Summoner Wars belongs to Plaid Hat Games. It can be found at www.plaidhatgames.com/games/summoner-wars/

Sunderved (3M-7W-Command)

Alright, I tried to ignore it but I can’t. I have to say it. I hate the Mountain Vargath art. It’s not just because of their dopey faces. I hate that they are just bland, brown smudges. From their commons to their summoners and across their champions, they’re all just brown, boring blobs. There’s no interest. There’s no inspiration. Even the colour palette is chosen to just get lost in the greater whole. And the poses are pretty lacklustre. The only way I can tell a champion from a summoner is to read the name.

Anyway, let’s put the bad art aside.

Sunderved is the standard for aggressive summoners. He’s melee so to cash in on his shorter range he gets an additional health and an additional attack. It’s a pretty good bruising stat line. Of course, if you’ve read my Alliance review, you know that it’s a bit misleading. You don’t lead the charge with these summoners. You still lose the game if they go down and while seven health is hearty, it isn’t insurmountable.

Course, this is where Sunderved’s ability comes in. And what an ability it is. Every Mountain Vargath common within 2 spaces of their commander gets an additional attack.

Let me repeat that. Every common in two spaces of Sunderved gets an additional dice in their attack.

Moyra only gives one common one additional dice. You can get a bonus three with this goat. Course, the catch is you have to use commons. And, unfortunately, Sunderved lives and breathes in the time of catch-up events and common hate. We just saw a summoner who had two powerful events that only trigger on having less commons than his opponent. And Assassinate only goes after commons. And Vlox isn’t even the meanest to commons. And his opponents are mostly going champions.

But that’s not to take away from the fact that Sunderved gives his a nice boost. And the boost is good against anything be it walls, conjurations, summoners or champions. He makes his commons quite the threat on his cheap little kids.

So, yeah. It’s good.

Unfortunately, not everything is as rosy. Sunderved’s events don’t measure quite as well as his ability. Let’s start with the lowest hanging fruit.

Torodin’s Advance is awful. It’s your one off event and isn’t even impressive for something you have to dig through over thirty cards to find. And it’s a combo card requiring you to have the matching champion Torodin on the field to have any effect. So surely it must do something spectacular right?

Wrong. You can move him two additional spaces.

Like, this is the definition of a bum card. It’s awkward to pull out. It’s not something you want to stuff your hand to play. It doesn’t even do anything good when you actually play it.

Sadly, things don’t improve much from here. Next up is Superior Planning which is an event tutor. Yet, you have two of these and the aforementioned Advance makes it so one third of your events to search for don’t do anything. They can pull from the discard, though, so they aren’t the worst tutors. And if you draw them before your other events you can at least thin your deck.

Next we have Muster which lets you pull two commons to your summoner. It should be good but it ends up not being that useful despite Sunderved wanting units around him. Partly because, once again, it’s a combo card. You either need commons really out of position or have them in your hand to summon when you get the card. Or you’re trucking it around and stuffing your hand slowing down your draw and magic generation.

evt-GreaterCommandGreater Command is probably the best and all it does is extend Sunderved’s command range to four spaces. Not bad but not something to call home about either.

Then you have Fall Back. It’s necessary to allow Sunderved to retreat from a failed advance. Unfortunately, retreating from your opponent ends up weakening your chances of victory.

You see, nothing adds to the survivability of Sunderved’s forces while he’s charging headlong at his enemy’s face. So while he’s trucking across the battlefield, his opponent is raising walls and surrounding his army. Two health, while better than one, is still quite easy to take down in a single turn as players are apt to prioritize their own cards with two or greater attack. And once those wounds start landing, Sunderved can do nothing about them.

In fact, the fastest way to stop Sunderved is to get four wounds on him. Not a herculean task especially since you’ll have two or more turns while the goat tries to angle a good position on your summoner to accomplish this. With only three health left, the goat has to bleat and retreat and once he’s cowering on his own side of the battlefield, he’s significantly less of a threat.

And that’s been the story of Sunderved in nearly all battles. Rush forward with glory and fame filling your eyes, get man handled for a turn or two and run crying back home. Sunderved is a bully in the classic sense of the word. He’s all bluster and pose without anything to back up his big words.

com-BruteBrute (1M-2W-2M-Knock Around)

My sister hates the brutes. I think they’re decent. You probably won’t pay for a lot of them, however, because that 2 magic could easily be 2 more warriors. However, they do give Sunderved a little bit of trickery. Opponents can sometimes forget that you can knock around your own units and you can fastball special Sunderved into the enemy’s face. Preferably with a Fall Back primed since for the manoeuvre to work you need to put 1-2 wounds on your summoner (a rare situation where the lack of a “may” in a seemingly positive ability turns out to be a negative). The 1 attack at 3 health isn’t a particularly popular statistical spread mostly because of how poor 1 attack is. However, keep them close to Sunderved and that’s easily a 2 attack at 3 health for 2 magic.

Unfortunately, their ability isn’t all that impactful. Positioning your brute to propel enemies in useful directions is far more clumsy than you’d imagine. They’re really good at punching enemies away but getting them to throw a helpless victim into the middle of your herd is far less likely. And if you’re just trying to keep an enemy away, the opponent can simply walk it back to place next turn especially since you have no other movement options to cover lanes.

They make good bodyguards for Sunderved. Alas, they are hard to get into position. This underscores the biggest issue facing a Sunderved assault. Moving all your pieces ends up being incredibly cumbersome and slow. You want to keep units around Sunderved to reduce the number of attacks that are directed his way. However, you also need to advance Sunderved to keep his warriors and rushers gaining his command boost. With only three movements per turn, you can’t move Sunderved and cover all his flanks. This is one of those primary issues facing aggressive factions that the Mountain Vargath revealed. It’s not just health that’s needed to keep a forward force to apply pressure against an enemy but mobility as well to get that force across the middle line.

And you aren’t going to use Brutes to overcome that issue. Their requirement to wound a unit to knock it around removes the natural health advantage of the Mountain Vargath commons. If they aren’t within range of Sunderved, their attack also has a non-insignificant 33% failure rate. And if you were relying on that knocked unit to cover Sunderved’s side then you’re in a massive heap of trouble.

So we’re looking at a rather unappealing stat line on an active ability that’s only relevant when the attack lands and doesn’t do a whole lot when it occurs in the first place. And it has limited utility outside of smacking enemies.

I don’t fault my sister for not being a fan.

com-Rusher

I’m really curious how these creatures managed to evolve that third opposable cloven keratin finger hoof. Unless… these aren’t goats! They’re tapirs!

Rusher (1M-2W-1M-Rush)

The rusher is as uninspiring as his name. He is, unfortunately, the only mobility option available to the Mountain Vargath. So, unless you’re relying on finding those Musters, these are the guys that can easily reinforce an active assault from your walls. Sadly, after their first turn, their ability essentially turns off. Kait loves nothing more than pitching these people across the field to perform hapless single dice attacks against her enemy. They’re great for being a diversion in that regard but unless she’s fighting one of the more fragile summoners like Endrich then these guys are rarely threatening.

They do benefit the most from Greater Command, however. That four space reach means that their constant forward charges can still pick up Sunderved’s bonus dice. However, their usefulness dramatically falls off as the enemy gets their walls raised and lanes blocked. Their mobility isn’t too difficult to work around and since you have such a limited window they never present an assassination threat.

They’re cheap, however, and can easily keep within Sunderved’s sphere of influence so maintaining them as 2 melee 2 health isn’t that rare.  They won’t be winning awards but they aren’t Vlox’s scrappers either.

com-WarriorWarrior (1M-2W-1M-Battle Frenzy)

Warriors are the most over powered common that no one talks about.

It’s funny. The Mountain Vargath warrior, on paper, is a beast. One magic for a unit that can, pretty easily, be a 2 melee or 3 if near Sunderved. With 2 health. By the numbers, this card should be absolutely broken. And yet, somehow, they seem unable to pull Sunderved from the bottom tier.

So what went so wrong?

For one, their bonus die is reserved for commons only. Yeah, champions are all the rage, but surely these guys can apply pressure before champions start dominating the field. Except, that bonus die isn’t applied to the enemy summoner either. So you need Sunderved right behind them if you want that scary 2 melee for 1 magic baseline. But if Sunderved is behind them then either he’s exposed or you’re already late into the game that champions are appearing. And late drawn warriors have a lengthy march to catch up to their fearless leader where they can be peppered by slings and arrows before they ever get to a face to smash.

Furthermore, these guys are pretty helpless against walls. Two attack isn’t fantastic against the nine health obstructions which your opponent is immediately going to crawl behind when they see the goats take the field. Your opponent knows that these guys are basically blank when on their own side and, because they are such a good unit if aggressive, your hand is basically forced by their presence. Woe to the Mountain Vargath that has to struggle through any early wall cards their enemy might throw down.

It’s almost a catch-22. Warriors are great so you want to use them and shape your strategy around maximizing their effectiveness. But because they are so good your opponent is going to avoid them and prioritize them. Unfortunately, there’s nothing to alleviate that pressure and Sunderved, as mentioned, has no preservation skills. They don’t have any tricks to get out a burst of crippling damage and they don’t have any sustain to survive a war of attrition. Worse still, they aren’t great on defence. You’re better off with rushers as at least they maintain their mobility.

I feel it’s necessary to point out they aren’t ranged here.

It was definitely a balancing decision to keep the Mountain Vargath from having really any range option. Sadly, they weren’t compensated with anything to make up this short coming. I think the designers erroneously felt that the extra bit of health would let them weather the first volley that a range attack grants. However, defensive archery units are quite capable at limiting retaliation angles so the lack of mobility hinders the Mountain Vargath yet again. They really needed more durability to survive the enemy’s defensive fire. While the designers gave them quite an astonishing amount of attack dice, they ended up being far too frail to leverage those attacks.

chm-GrowdenGrowden (3M-6W-6M-Sunder Hammer)

Growden is the champion that you don’t want to play but you’re likely to keep in your hand just in case you need him. Nothing brings an assault to a screeching halt that one or two wall cards hedging a timid summoner in. Those nine health speed bumps are more then enough to stall a game for a proper defence to be summoned and for Sunderved to be surrounded. And it’s trivially easy to attack the Mountain Vargath if they attempt to siege a walled position given their lack of ranged pressure.

Growden can break that line. Two auto wounds is a sufficient barrage to rip down a wall in about three turns. His base three attack is also threatening enough that once those pesky walls are down he’s still a problem. He can even keep breaking down those obstructions while murdering the defenders. So why not summon him all the time?

Well, as mentioned, Sunderved is a common focused leader. He gains little to nothing from Sunderved and you want to be using his hefty six cost to play more rushers and warriors. He’s also not the best against other champions. The best of the elites have powerful abilities that make them even more threatening in a fight. Growden’s hammer won’t ever give him the edge in a head-to-head conflict with another champion especially if they can be reinforced through a summoner’s abilities or events.

He does address a problematic tactic, so in that case he’s useful. It just always hurts whenever I have to put him on the table.

chm-Quen

The one thing I like about the art design of the Vargath is their sexual dimorphism. It’s a neat visual distinction for an anthropomorphic critter.

Quen (2R-4W-5M-Chain Lightning)

Phew, Quen. You are the sole ranged option available in Sunderved’s base deck. And, consequently, you’re far more costly than other equivalent ranged champions in other decks. But since you’ve got a monopoly on bows, you’re begrudgingly worth the price.

It further hurts that the old girl demands more magic for her ability. But then she does have 4 dice at range which is enough to be a sizeable killing threat if she can have a safe corridor to advance on the enemy summoner. But that four health. Phew. So much for the goats being hardy. She needs almost as much protection as Sunderved.

But she can be quite the surprise if the enemy forgets that the goats can sling shots. She’s the champion I try to field the most and it is often to your benefit to chain lightning against two different targets if you can clear the board of the threats. Otherwise, she’s your best answer to other champions so you want to hold on to her until the first of the enemy’s chosen falls so you can retaliate with her electricity.

Unfortunately, your hand can get pretty clogged if you’re waiting with Growden, Quen and some events in your hand.

chm-TorodinTorodin (2M-7W-6M-Trample)

You’d think that, given he’s the only champion with his own event, that Torodin would be some kind of monster. And yet, he’s easily the worst champion in Sunderved’s arsenal. He has the lowest attack of the group (if you take in the fact Quen can pay to double hers). Two attack on a champion is grossly lacklustre when you remember that the mighty warrior can have 2-3 depending on circumstances. To make up for it, Torodin has the mighty trample ability. He can pass through common units to inflict an automatic wound against them. Sadly, he has no improved movement capabilities so we’re looking at a single auto wound. On a common. You know, those units that your warriors are trained to murder wholesale.

And since he can’t trample champions, he’s straight up inferior to most in a head-to-head fight. He’s designed to combat the thing that the rest of Sunderved’s deck is design to combat but yet he ends up being worse at it. Use his 6 magic to get six warriors. They are better in nearly every way.

Build him and his awful event for magic.

I can’t help but find the Mountain Vargath interesting. Though their design ended up missing the mark, I feel they were on the right track. There’s a number of good ideas for making a hyper aggressive faction here. But to understand the difficulties facing aggression requires an intimate understanding of Summoner Wars more wonky attributes.

We all know the adage, “A good defence is a strong offence.” Sadly, this isn’t true (yet) in Summoner Wars. The nature of the game’s mechanics put a significant benefit on being defensive. It’s a combination of summoning off walls helps defenders more than attackers and the limitation of 3 moves and attacks a turn put a greater benefit to ranged units than melee. Wall summoning ensures that defenders can get their melee units into range on the turn they summon them – an advantage attackers sorely lack. Having to fight around their walls typically lets the defender determine attack avenues and limit options for their stronger units to get surrounded. And stopping to attack walls means that defenders get first strike when they summon defends to protect them.

And when assaulting units fall, it’s really hard to reinforce them. Unlike defenders, who can spawn infinitely from their walls (which can appear instantaneously away from crowding forces), attackers must march their units after their forward advance, often giving a free turn or two to finish off the first wave of weaken and destroy the reinforcements. This is even more dangerous for Sunderved who needs to be amongst his units to boost them to effective levels. Whenever a common falls, it opens up Sunderved’s flanks.

So what are hallmarks of a successful attacking force?

The nice thing about Alliances is that it’s a refinement of prior ideas and attempts. Moyra is essentially Sunderved 2.0. While Moyra’s presence only boosts one common, it also gives them a bit more movement to catch up with the rest of the force. She also has cherubim as her primary attacker, a unit with swiftness and slipperiness so that the little angels can catch up easily or wiggle through defenders to get into good positions. They’re ranged, so without Moyra’s influence, they have a threat zone of six spaces. That’s one more than the rusher and doesn’t put the cherubim out of position as it does the melee Mountain Vargath.

But having a stronger core unit isn’t the only advantage Moyra offers. Her defenders and blinding light toughens up the entire force, increasing survivability of the primary force and increasing the odds they can survive the inevitable counter attack. Moyra also intervenes on key units, taking the hits for them. She also has Father Benjamin to ease the pressure of the inevitable wounds that come her way to keep her presence on the front lines.

The other methods for more successful assaults are to overwhelm defenders with bonus movement and attacks like the Cave Goblins or to get forward summoning points that matches the defender’s wall advantage. Rallul can summon off his stone golems. Swamp Orcs are built entirely around overwhelming the enemy with vine walls to block summoning points and give them forward spawns.

So the Mountain Vargath serve an important point in design history for demonstrating that the bar for assaulting needs to be just a little higher. They were a valiant attempt, however. I can respect the design philosophy even if it came up short. I have more forgiveness for these earlier summoners as they tread new waters. It remains to be seen if their second summoners address these issues, however.

Decloaking the Last

Well April is nearly upon us which means I’m going to be neck deep in work and wholly disinterested in emerging to post to this illustrious site. So, I have two options. Either I follow my co-contributors and politely ignore the Internet’s existence for four weeks or I prepare some entries ahead of time. Course, I normally don’t know what I’m going to write until the day that it’s due so I need some topic I can cover for four weeks that can be of some interest to someone out there.

As it so happens, Plaid Hat Games has started to preview eight new summoners for their card meets board game Summoner Wars. Hey, I remember doing this last year so let’s try this again!

We’re going to do something slightly different this time. Or, really, it’s something familiar. I’m going to be reviewing stuff that came out aeons ago and everyone has seen, experienced and forgotten. But I’m incessantly behind, like a cultural anthropologist dusting off ancient relics from a forgotten dig site. As I have mentioned, whenever I get some new Summoner Wars goodies, my sister and I immediately sit down for a tournament to gauge its usefulness. Well, this series is going to take a peek at some of the results of these tournaments.

Much like my review of the Alliances set, I’m going to be looking at eight factions and how they stacked against each other over two tournaments. First was the Master Set Throw-down wherein the six factions from the first big box of Summoner Wars battled against each other and two independent summoners for top billing. As with the Alliance Tournament, my sister and I rotated playing each faction against the other until a winner emerged.

Supplementing this result is the Mucho Grando Tournament where we had everything and the kitchen sink thrown into brackets to compete. Unlike the other tournaments, factions were seeded into rankings and a regular competitive format was followed, obeying double elimination rules. This tournament is notable in that factions didn’t fight everyone. Decks that hard counter others had the potential to entirely miss their strongest match-ups and created a very fortune driven competition.

Summoner Wars Alliances belongs to Plaid Hat Games. It can be found at www.plaidhatgames.com/games/summoner-wars/

Summoner Wars belongs to Plaid Hat Games. It can be found at www.plaidhatgames.com/games/summoner-wars/

Thus, it should come as no surprise that some factions did wildly different across the two matches. However, I’m glad to start off my review with one that was not. This faction was inspiringly consistent: they always came last.

Ladies and gentlemen, I introduce you to the worst faction (across these two tournaments) in Summoner Wars: the Cloaks!

Having won a total of two matches across both tournaments, this placement is free of any controversy. The Cloaks have earned their dead last spot and participation award through blood, sweat and many, many tears.

But who are these noble losers? Why do they struggle so much? What is up with their summoner’s gagging collar? Let us dive into these pressing questions and get to the root of what makes a summoner bad in the unending war for Itharia.

The Cloaks come from the old guard – that first wave of releases which everyone likes to criticise. They have the hallmarks of the first forays into the game’s design. Is there catch-up events that trigger when you have fewer units that your opponent? You betcha. Is there built in common hate cards? Why, of course. Are there cards which no sane person would ever play and exist solely to be tossed into the magic pile? Well, the Pope poops in the woods, does he not.

I think the Cloaks were an attempt at a combo faction that was meant to rely on esoteric set-ups and trickery to snatch victory. In fact, they were probably meant to encapsulate the “assassination” style of play – wherein the opponent uses superior movement and abilities in order to isolate and deal a game winning number of wounds to his enemy before she is able to utilize a more traditional and board domineering strategy to regain control and strangle out a win. I mean, with events called Assassinate, Cloak of Shadows, Raid and Spy, how is the faction not suppose to represent this underhanded and roguish style? And is there truly any style more frightening than the omnipresent threat of losing the game from a single turn chicanery?

Well, yes. Turtling is more frightful and more successful. Assassination focused decks encourage turtling and generally lack any means to defeat it. A defensive player can generally keep themselves locked away behind impenetrable corridors stuffed with tough defenders or unshakeable walls. Perhaps more egregious, so worried were the designers of the effectiveness of assassination (since, you know, victory is actually only determined by the summoner’s death and no other metric) that Plaid Hat took every opportunity to make the Cloak’s natural playstyle as much an uphill battle as possible. And if there’s one problem that persists across the faction is a surprising dearth of high attack options in a faction that’s meant to strike hard, fast and fleeting.

And for the Cloaks, there isn’t any other avenue left to them. If they can’t get a shocking win in a one turn pile-up on the enemy’s summoner then they’re not ever going to win. Their results demonstrate this problem. They only ever managed a single win in either tournament, the sort of results you’d expect through sheer dice hate alone. The path to victory for the erstwhile rebels is mostly through devote prayer to a higher power and hoping your enemy is cursed with many 1s while you get nothing but 6s.

Vlox (2R-6W-Master of the Art)

Vlox is remarkable in almost how unremarkable he is. He sports the generic six health and two attack at range of the summoner line-up. Oddly enough, however, he’s rather expected to shoulder a lot of the assault despite lacking the additional health or attack that aggressive summoners generally sport. His strength lies directly in his ability. Master of the Art allows him to copy the ability of any Cloak unit on the board. This can create really strong combos. It can also mean that some turns he may be stuck with a Greater Sneak or Raid that can’t trigger because you were just curb stomped by a more effective opponent. At the very least, you choose during the event phase so you can summon whatever ability you want so long as you’re holding it in your hand or manage a lucky draw. It’s the sort of ability that has infinite scaling and is only limited by the releases Vlox can access.

It’s a good and necessary ability that would have been faction defining if it were in a deck that was more effective. Unfortunately, because there are so few decent tactics for the Cloaks, it makes their strategy a bit one note. Your enemy knows that you’re going to try and abuse the potential for Master of the Art and will do what they can to limit the effectiveness of Vlox while pinning him in and trying to force subpar mimicry. They don’t have all the information, however, so you can still pull some surprises against even the most attentive opponent. But the more wise your enemy is to your ways, the harder it gets to slip a scrapper by unnoticed.

evt-SpyHis events aren’t awful, however. Though anyone sporting Magic Drain can hardly be considered to have terrible events. Yes, even in the Cloaks, Magic Drain is silly. There’s a bit of anti-synergy with the Cloaks as Vlox would like to have more units on the board in order to leave him as many options for Master of the Arts as possible but he also needs to have the threat of a double Magic Drain ruining an enemy’s planned counter attack. That said, Assassinate is great for taking out hardy commons – the biggest weakness that Vlox can face as he has little response for those. Assassinate is fantastic against the Filth since it not only eliminates a dangerous mutation but refunds the cost as well.

Just to give a comparison for Assassinate, however. Plaid Hat have just revealed a 2 magic cost event in the new Shadow Elf summoner repertoire. Not only does the Shadow Elf get to draw two cards when they play their paid for Event but they are also able to give every one of their units the ability to summon – for free – a unit from your hand if they manage to kill something that turn. Vlox, in comparison, can remove a single common. To make it even worthwhile, you’ll want to target a 2 magic or more card. Otherwise, you’re paying through the nose in order to open a firing lane.

Cloak of Shadows also costs 2 magic (essentially because why are you wasting this event on a common). It’s good since it means you can only be hit by dice rolls of 6 for a whole turn. And you’ll need to save it almost universally for Vlox after he’s managed to sneak his way into trouble.

Spy is fantastic if inconsistent. Being able to mess with the opponent’s draw is something we haven’t really seen at all in Summoner Wars which is unfortunate since it’s a powerful and interesting mechanic. But if you can’t get a pivotal champion in those five cards to pitch immediately into the discard, then there’s not a lot of advantage to be gained. Most events either have multiples in a deck or aren’t super important if one is discarded. Throwing walls to the bottom of the enemy’s draw is great but throwing garbage commons is rather disheartening.

Raid is fine and only held back by the criminally low number of thieves in Vlox’s deck. It can be used as a Greater Sneak substitute to get Vlox on a summoner or to get him to the back line in order to teleport out of the enemy’s territory if you’ve overextended, however.

com-GunnerGunner (1R-1W-1M-Greater Sneak)

Gunners are pretty lame, I won’t lie. Rarely do you want to spend what precious magic you have on them. One attack is lackluster. One attack on a one health is pitiful. Greater Sneak can be great for assassinating but you’re not assassinating anything with a single dice. You’re pinging and praying. I generally try and keep one of my starting alive to give Vlox the option of a solo three extra spaces move. These gals just fold under pressure, however. And, sadly, there’s not a whole lot of anything in the deck to alleviate pressure on them. They’re your go to magic fodder.

com-Scrapper

To this day I can’t figure out what this guy is wearing. Are those boots with toes? Does he just have a horrible case of jaundice and square knees?

Scrapper (1M-2W-1M-Blindside)

Scrappers are your surprise factor. They can help teleport a Cloak of Shadows Vlox right on to the enemy if you’re able to get one to the enemy’s back row. That is, of course, assuming you hit. With only one die (yet again), you have only a 66% chance of getting that wound that will let Vlox jump. If you whiff, then you have a weak, low health twit standing in the middle of enemy forces looking stupid. Sadly, this is your only option for a survivable Cloak common without dipping into second summoners and that extra health is sometimes worth praying on to get a little more utility in a second round. They aren’t particularly threatening, however. And don’t think that having other scrappers capitalize on Blindside is a threat. Three gentle one dice love slaps isn’t going to give anyone nightmares. Course, this threat would also require each successive scrapper to hit too. So, yet again, slap those hands together in prayer and hope you got a good 6 streak in you.

com-ThiefThief (1M-1W-0M-Steal)

Thieves are probably the best common in Vlox’s deck. That’s kind of worrying when a zero coster is your only hope. Unfortunately, the base deck doesn’t have lots of thieves. Their lack of a cost is great for taking off pressure on your economy game. And if you’re able to get them to the back of the opponent’s board, they can do some damage to your opponent’s plans. Seriously, though, the Cloak player should choose what’s stolen at random instead of giving the opponent the option to just toss whatever useless common they have in their hand. At least then you could pray to pluck a key champion your enemy is saving for. Unfortunately, don’t expect to get many steals off. One health is easy to pick off and you don’t have much of anything to distract from raid runs. Your best bet is to summon off a forward wall, Raid down an empty corridor and then destroy your thief for a 2 magic swing.

It won’t win you a game, like ever, but you’ll feel better about yourself. That’s really the best victory you can hope for. These small victories. You are playing the Cloaks, after all. Oh, you can also copy a thief, move Vlox to the enemy’s back row and destroy yourself to spare the pain of actually drawing out games. That’s cool too, I suppose.

Accessed from www.plaidhatgames.com/games/summoner-wars/Dagger (2M-6W-6M-Backstab)

Alright, so the commons are duds. Maybe the champions make up for it. I mean, this wouldn’t be the only faction with awful commons that are made good by their champion line up. There are the Deep Dwarves who… no wait. Well how about the Benders… hm, nope. Or maybe the Guild Dwarves… no they have defenders. Hm, all the good decks have at least one good common. Weird.

But there’s Dagger! He continues the theme of hitting like wet ramen. He has an ability that gives him a bit more bite but is incredibly tricky if not impossible to pull off save for the most fringe cases. At least he has 6 health. Yeah, that’s a positive! Dagger has six health! And unlike the scrappers, his boots cover his toes! That’s two positives. He has average health and proper footwear! And have you checked out that codpiece? Man’s practically on the cutting edge of fashion.

chm-ScamScam (2R-5W-5M-Escape)

Ah, Scam. You’re really the only other option for a Cloak victory. If your scrapper gambit is going to fail, Scam represents your alternative. Save as much magic as humanly possible, drop this guy to the board and run around being annoying with both Vlox and Scam fretting away your magic pile. Is it effective? Of course not! If it was, the Cloaks would win more than the rare game on a blue moon. But at least you can nettle your opponent. Nettle! That’s worth the price of admission.

Scam’s on the lower end for champions which is the best I can say about him.

chm-VioletViolet (2R-4W-4M-Whirling Blades)

Violet is literally the only good unit in Vlox’s forces. Two range for four magic is a pretty good deal. Sure, she’s paper, but that’s hardly something new for the Cloaks. She’s a decent candidate for Cloak of Shadows and a fantastic target for Vlox to copy. She’s not Satara levels of good but if I made a list of top champions, she could certainly squeeze in there on the bottom. That she can hit multiple units means she’s really going to do more damage than a two attack would normally. Course, her status as the only threatening thing to hit the board means she’s going to attract aggression way more than a three legged cat limping past a pack of starving wolves.

Don’t stare at her legs, though. She hates when people do that.

So, yeah. The Cloaks weaknesses are apparent and their strengths are obtuse. I’m not entirely certain what went wrong with them but their weaknesses are so ubiquitous that they have to be intentional. For whatever reason, Plaid Hat wanted a deck full of low attack, low health units with expensive events and situational powers. It’s the poster child of a drawback melting pot. Its designed path to victory is not only difficult in its own right but made even more difficult by the pieces that are suppose to accomplish it. The Cloaks don’t even struggle against specialized enemies. A simple 1 attack 2 health common will give the cloaks problems since they can’t kill it in one attack but their own units can die immediately to the counter attack. And this doesn’t even address the fact they have no answers to a strong champion focused game.

They don’t really have an answer for anything. An aggressive faction like the Cave Goblins will overwhelm the Cloaks with their additional attacks, movement and cheap bodies. The Cloaks will break against a defensive faction’s protections. And they have no way to protect themselves from other assassination attempts. Even the Alliances assassin wasn’t the greatest but Marek certainly has a lot more tricks than Vlox does for getting wounds on the enemy. Not to mention it isn’t too difficult to get three ranged attacks on Marek’s hunters against an enemy summoner.

So they don’t do anything well. They can’t respond to anything well. And… well… they just lose.

Blood is Thicker

Well team, I was hoping to have a review ready for today. With my schedule clearing somewhat, I was plugging at Shadowrun: Hong Kong until the wee hours of the morning. Alas, I have failed to meet my deadline. And unlike an actual video game review site, I won’t do a proper look at the work until I’ve completed it. Granted, this isn’t a major loss as the main topic I wished to discuss in my review I can cover here today while still leaving myself that material for a future date when I have no other valuable words to scribble for the website. So if you want to know what Shadowun: Hong Kong really is and whether or not it’s worth your time then you’ll just have to hold out a little longer.

But Shadowrun: Hong Kong did touch upon something that I’ve seen a few times in video games but that I’ve rarely seen done well. And that is the topic of family.

It’s a fantasy staple for protagonists to be orphans (and that is sad), a trope that roleplaying games based on fantasy works were more than happy to lap up at every turn. Why this is, I cannot accurately say. For video games I can understand the appeal. Family is an incredibly complex social structure and you can’t have any idea how your player is going to feel towards one. I don’t think there exists a social structure tighter, an observation made by humans for as long as we were able to record our interactions. A look at just about any cultural mythos and you’ll see the sordid affairs of family members and their interactions the heart of nearly every tale. Uncountable number of words have been inked on the subject and there’s untold baggage involved in dissecting the roles of family members and the expectations of the individuals to each other. And for better or worse, the narratives in video games have always taken a fairly shallow and light touch. You don’t see a deep exploration of the human condition or of complex themes. RPGs are pretty ubiquitous in their adherence to the stock “Good guys vs Evil dudes” telling where the lines between heroes and villains are pretty stark. These stories are almost always plot heavy, revolving around the need for goody two-shoes protagonist to stop puppy-kicking antagonist from getting mythical MacGuffin and destroying or ruling the world.

Having to pop down to the market and haggle with the ornery bread merchant in order to procure a side for tonight’s dinner doesn’t really enrich that tapestry. Family in these classical settings serve mostly as a springboard for the protagonist’s motivations. This is, to say, that your family—if they are to show up at all—are basically going to be portrayed as lovingly saccharine as is humanly possible within their five minutes of screen time before being brutally and irrevocably murdered so that you feel compelled to go off and get just revenge against the black-hearted bastards that would commit this universal tragedy against people you knew for less time than a typical bowel movement. Good luck if you expect a memorial to your dearly devoted Mama or if you expect any NPC to ever mention them outside of the first twenty minutes of gameplay.

Duncan

Shadowrun: Hong Kong and the awesome Duncan Wu belong to Hare Brained Schemes.

It’s a humorously ironic event, especially considering how often RPGs devote so much of their time trying to write interesting companion characters that you’ll feel attached to for the next eighty hours you’re stuck with them fighting the Big Bad. And it’s not like video games were creative in this treatment of family and doing so under the pressure of trying to make interactive family dynamics that could match their audience’s expectations. The most famous fantasy novels love to shove the protagonist’s family “in the fridge.” Lord of the Rings? Check. Harry Potter? Check. Lies of Locke Lamorra? Don’t even need to bother since he’s a street orphan (the other common cheat) but don’t worry, we’ll kill whatever foster parent figure steps in to fill those formative years.

Needless to say, it’s a bit overdone. But so widespread is this problem, that even the few moments where you’re given a family member that isn’t murdered immediately, you’re almost assured to have the majority of your kin run through with swords, spears, claws or magical equivalents. If I were a psychologist, I’d been scheduling counselling appointments for every single fantasy writer from now until the end of the year. So, yeah, needless to say I find it refreshing when we’re able to hold onto at least one family member, as rare as it occurs.

I’m happy to say that Shadowrun: Hong Kong—while trying to have and eat its cake—does provide a family member to your rag tag group. I’m sad to say that he’s the least developed of the bunch. It’s a great disappointment, especially when you consider your foster brother’s role in the story and compare his interaction potential to the other strangers that you obsessively accumulate like a child starting their first game of Pokemon. You’ll have far more personal and meaningful conversations with a man trying his damnedest to create a robot dog to treat his undiagnosed autism in a world filled with artificial intelligences than you will the man that supposedly grew up with you. It felt very much like the creators were paralyzed with trying to not force the player into a specific backstory that they both accidentally forced them into a backstory which they refused to explain. It’s understandable that a video game is going to be constrained by its programming when it comes to the story it can tell. I like having total freedom in character generation to make the character I want but, as a player, I recognize there’s a limit to the role that I can play. If I want to play the glib socialite, I need the game to provide the opportunities for me to express that character. If none of my dialogue options are glib then I certainly can’t play that character. Likewise, if I want to play the poor orphan and you throw a sibling that I never wanted into the mix, I’ll learn to adapt.

But I think what puts writers off family in video games is that it requires more work. The nice things about strangers is that they can’t reminisce over your history. The only thing they know is the game and the events you’ve shared with them. In fact, there’s a surprising lack of curiosity in RPGs about the player in general. Even when you’re just a no-named wanderer, you will rarely (if ever) get questions about where you came from or what you did prior to murdering villains and saving the day. There’s this sense that writers make plotlines despite their players and you’re just this faceless force that happens to come in and muck everything up. Or, to be more generous, you fill that big empty space they never finished fleshing out called “the protagonist.” And for your reward in doing half their work, they’ll politely not ask you anything about it.

latest

Baldur’s Gate and the adorable Imoen belong to Black Isle, Interplay or whoever own them now.

I can appreciate the intention to give the player all the freedom they can and that the argument of family and a history constrains a player. But we’re not afforded this sort of freedom in our personal lives, so it seems strange to try and push this standard. I mean, we define ourselves by our choices and our actions. By denying us a history we just make our persona all the less of a person. When I come to a group of bandits holding hostages, my approach to this situation is molded and shaped by my experiences and history. Having someone there to voice that, I feel, could have a very interesting impact on both story development and player behaviour.

Imagine that standard RPG encounter but instead of rushing in to murder all the terrible bandits, you have a character pipe up at your elbow. They ask if these bandits truly deserve immediate execution, mentioning how they look like people on hard times just like our parents had faced when we were five. And do you not wonder if father might have given in to banditry during that long winter when the fields were barren and we had felt a hunger we had never known before? Could these people be just trying to find food for their family as well? Oh, one is taking to breaking a captive’s fingers for fun? Ok, nevermind, they’re just psychopaths, let’s go in and stop them.

I’m reminded of a character from the Baldur’s Gate trilogy. In the first game, your foster father dies after the tutorial, stereotypically propelling you on your epic quest that will shape the realms and blah, blah, blah. But through the game you’re accompanied by your foster sister, Imoen who always had a smile and joke to entertain you along the way. The opening tutorial even established the dynamic you two would play, whether you were a joker just like her or more of a stoic, rules abiding older brother/sister that just wished she would start pulling her weight someday. I feel that without Imoen, the Baldur’s Gate story would not have been as compelling as it was. This is the western development studio gold standard and the writers cleverly used Imoen as a vessel to express the changes in character to the revelations of the main plot line without having to force the player to go through a classic emotional arc. Your sister served as the protagonist with you able to follow in her footsteps or simply supplement her development if you choose to be unchanging as the tides. And when things happened to her, I felt responsible and more invested in the outcome than if the writers decided to torment one of my other disposable companions. More importantly, I was able to have an intimate relationship with a girl without her wanting to crawl into my cot—an event that’s becoming exceedingly rare in games.

latest

This is your father in Fallout 3 and he’s lame unlike the other two mentioned.

More than anything, it feels strange for this topic to be so absent from game stories. It’s perhaps the one easy element which everyone could empathize with. I doubt few people can understand the hardships of traveling mercenaries or the difficulties of murdering giant, fire-breathing lizards. However, nearly everyone can understand the troubles of family—of the concern over the well-being of others who you may not always see eye-to-eye but you know they’ll typically support you no matter what. Or, even more interesting, they’ll hurt you like no other can.

London Has Fallen Review

I saw London Has Fallen on the weekend. You may not have heard of it. I didn’t know about it until I went to the cinema to watch it. It’s a sequel to the blockbuster and cultural cornerstone Olympus Has Fallen starring Gerard Butler in his depressingly ageing attempt to appear youthful and relevant in an action hero role. Evidentially, he could not beat Henry Cavill’s audition for Superman.

It’s worse than Olympus Has Fallen. If you want a more in-depth review of the movie, go here and simply replace all instances of Olympus with London:

http://somewherepostculture.com/olympus-ballin/

I’m serious. This movie gives an awful sense of deja vu. Not just because the premise and weaknesses of its predecessor are out in full force but also because the movie spends a helluva lot of time aping other famous movies in an attempt to crawl out of the cesspool of its own excesses. I suppose it’s kind of an achievement that it made me think back to Olympus Has Fallen fondly, as though I were witnessing the mis-appropriation of some time held classic soullessly resurrected in the name of easy profit.

And if Olympus Has Fallen is unrealistic, London Has Fallen has ramped up its glorified American flag-waving delusions to the umpteenth degree. What’s even more infuriating about the movie is that it does pull on current issues–specifically middle eastern radicalism and the blow back on western society–but does it in such an empty gesture as to provide no nuance or greater understanding for the audience. Those devious Muslims are killing noble, family-loving westerns because we’re good and they’re bad and that’s just the way it is.

They also have an inordinate amount of money that would make Augustus St. Cloud blush. And that sentence just makes me wish I was discussing Venture Brothers instead of this pile of rubbish.

Anyway, if you’re bored and cursed with too much cash than you know what to do with, I recommend you see Zootopia.

On the other hand, there’s been new Summoner Wars announcements! Take a gander at this fantastic art!

Accessed from http://www.plaidhatgames.com/images/u/WebsiteReveal.jpg

Summoner Wars belongs to Plaid Hat Games and associated individuals and whatnot. It can be found here: http://www.plaidhatgames.com/. And no, I have no idea what’s going on with that girl. I’m assuming it’s the result of Take Your Child to Work Day.

I’m excited. It should give me something to discuss for a good month or so. Though it’ll probably be a month of complaining. Oh well! Happy March Break!

 

Welcome Back, Commander Part 2

In the second part of my X-Com 2 review, I’m going to be addressing the most important aspect of the game: it’s story.

Screenshots taken by me. So suck it!That’s a lie. Not that I’m going to talk about the story, because you can bet your alien plasma grenade I’ll get upwards of 2,000 words out of this thing, but that the story is really all that important. There’s a reason I speak very little about it in the first part and that’s because the draw of X-Com is, first and foremost, it’s game play. The story itself is the innocuous window dressing on a candy store. You’re here for the sugar, you can’t really be bothered that there’s a few tears in the curtain and what might be a mustard stain.

As with any discussion about a recently released piece of media and its story and narrative components, there are going to be massive spoilers detailed within. If you care about story (I know I do!) then please don’t read until you have finished. If you don’t care about story, well you could probably read the first half and know all you need to know. But I’ll give a quick summary here just for convenience:

Buy X-Com 2. It’s fantastic.

Now that we’ve got that out of the way, let’s discuss plot.

X-Com 2’s plot is awful. There’s no other way to put it. This is amateur hour at a sci-fi convention. And no, I’m not just basing this on the fact that there’s really not much too it because it’s a systems based game and not a narrative driven one. This is acknowledging that there really wasn’t going to be more words dedicated to its plot than a 10,000 word script that I could pump out in a day given sufficient motivation. No, the biggest issue is that X-Com 2 is pretty much a reskin of X-Com: Enemy Unknown. But what works wonders for game systems is a detriment to narrative structure.

2016-02-10_00002One of the things I was really excited about with the announcement of X-Com 2 was this whole rebellion vibe. I thought it was a really clever idea to not only separate the reboot from its original source material (and if you aren’t a regular to this site, I loathe blind reboots over aspiring for novelty and creativity) but that it opened up far more interesting themes and ideas to explore. There could be many interesting questions asked by placing the player in essentially a terrorist role: a guerilla combat position where your foe is significantly more advanced, more established and more supplied than you are. It would be like examining The Heart of Darkness but not from some enlightened British Imperialist but from the perspective of the oppressed natives themselves.  It would be easy to paint the conquerors as blood thirsty monsters but more interesting to ask to what lengths and the appropriateness of fighting back against an imperialistic force would be.

To make the questions even more topical would be to have X-Com perform missions that are, essentially, little more than outright terrorism. We’re talking about (potentially) suicidal missions sent to destroy alien centres or monuments in an effort to undermine their authority and power. You could create situations where the player stops and wonders if perhaps in the zealousness that X-Com doesn’t occasionally slip into the role of the creature it’s looking to slay. Do you put in the extra effort to save civilians that may be innocent or unaware of the machinations you struggle against? Are you willing to compromise the mission to preserve your ideology or are sacrifices important to make for the greater picture? That you could ask these questions and not have to frame it around specific game elements like your own soldiers lives could have been really interesting. In fact, one of the best small details they added was to give a name for each civilian that’s killed.

The only problem is that civilians are typically only killed by the aliens themselves.

I like that I'm the only one that will visit Kait while she's in the hospital. Do I care that much or does she not have any other friends? You decide!

I like that I’m the only one that will visit Kait while she’s in the hospital. Do I care that much or does she not have any other friends? You decide!

Outside of restructuring the flow of the game, there’s very little actually gained by spinning the balance of power on its head. It never really feels like you’re “exposing the alien plot” during the course of the game nor is there really any plot to expose. As I said, this is basically Enemy Within all over again. The aliens are here “for reasons” that are never explained because they’re probably not figured out by the creators. They’re looking to mass genocide humanity “for reasons” that make even less sense now that the game has established that they went through enormous amount of work and compromise in the last twenty years to create the world you’re fighting in now.

Seriously, the whole alien plot is that they’re making Avatars for their decaying bodies. Ok, that’s fine. Ancient race dying out is a bit of trope that’s over played but it’s an understandable motivation. What doesn’t make sense is that they need to process enormous amounts of human genetic material in order to accomplish this. And when I mean process, I’m talking about Soylent Green sort of industrial work. So, the aliens come to Earth, negotiate a truce for whatever reason, go to great lengths to create massive city centres created, staffed and policed by painstakingly genetically fabricated creatures all so they can open up a bunch of “gene clinics” that are used to trick people into voluntarily entering the sci-fi equivalent of Cargill Meat Processing? Why the hell didn’t they just point their giant ass weapons at everyone and tell them to line up for the meat grinder. Or just shot them and toss them into the meat grinder?

I mean, thank god for Hitler and Genghis Khan. These two individuals have been the easiest villain scapegoats for most of fictional human history. They operate on such simplistic “good vs bad” dynamics that it’s not only brain dead, it’s creatively bankrupt to boot. It makes so the thrilling final mission where the player leads their crack squad of highly trained troopers through the alien secret facility so ludicrous as the villains attempt to vainly discourage you from murdering their asses as they attempt to explain that they’re not killing you, they’re saving you. By literally killing you.

It’s intellectually and philosophically dishonest and contradictory. It makes everything leading up to that point so painfully incoherent.

First, why didn’t the aliens simply tell us their plan? Clearly they don’t need to murder all of humanity to make new bodies for themselves. Also, clearly, they aren’t strong enough to just come in and take what they need hence the twenty years of pointless infrastructure building and propaganda spinning (unless these were just “create work” programs). They attempt to paint their actions as being of benefit to humanity, so clearly some mutual co-operation would be far more successful for both sides. Unless they’re lying about trying to save humanity in which case why bother with the last ditch misdirection? Or maybe they didn’t consider mankind evolved enough to hold a conversation with though that makes their feeble attempt to beg for their life in the final mission all the more bizarre.

Look, I get that they’re trying to set up Terror from the Deep with these games–and that Terror from the Deep is essentially X-Com fights Cthulu. However, trying to force some sort of greater continuity or franchise establishment is a self-defeating purpose. We know they’re going to make sequels for as long as they sell but you’re not going to get any coherent narrative out of all that. You can’t keep running into “bigger fish” in the universe that every enemy you face is desperately trying to beat or ward off. Just pick one motivation for the aliens and stick with it. Either the aliens are here for Imperialistic reasons, viewing humanity as little more than savages and not worthy of their time or consideration while they hide behind their technological advancements as “enlightenment” and the “right to subjugate as they see fit.” Or, they are wardens trying desperately to deal with some greater threat all the while attempting to save their stewards through their own misguided and alien “methods” that are simply misunderstood.

You either have the aliens constantly trying to talk to humanity but failing because of the huge cultural and biological differences or you have them not speaking at all. The alien representative then is either a erstwhile speaker who simply can’t seem to find the words to properly communicate the goals and desires of his creators or is just a lie used as a means of mindless pacification.

Personally, I prefer this sort of misunderstood steward angle. It creates a more complex situation and introduces greater shades of grey into the conflict. Whereas everyone basically agrees now that Imperialism is bad (and thus is probably what they were going for because of low hanging fruit and all that), I think the alternative works far better with this X-Com as rebels motif. Sure, they are justified in their violent response to the alien occupation and the actions taken by them. In this direction, humans aren’t kidnapped when “desirable genetic sequences” are identified. Instead, the humans that disappear from the gene clinics could be the ones that are simply untreatable through their medicine. Instead of that individual dying to their terminal disease or whatnot, they are then put through the alien’s Forge facility that, yes, splices their bodies with other genes to create the hybrid Advent but the individual is kept alive both individual and genetically as they are used in these cloning vats.

Cinematic silliness at its height.

Cinematic silliness at its height.

And, sure, you can add more fuel for X-Com’s actions by having them legitimately kidnap anyone with psychic capabilities in order to undergo procedures for the Avatar Project. That could be construed as the price of this beneficial arrangement. The Elders see that humanity is served through their more enlightened ways–their diseases are cured, peace is established and cities created to raises the standard of living of the native species well beyond that of what they found when they first arrived. The only downside is that every now and then a member or two will need to be “sacrificed” to the gods in order for them to continue to seek a biological form capable of sustaining their psychic minds or whatever. The aliens are both flawed but understandable. They are still antagonistic, especially since they would probably still see themselves above the need to explain themselves to humanity in the first place.

In this way, I’d restructure the final mission so you aren’t having the Elders blather to you in a desperate plea for their life. Instead, have X-Com traverse the facility while your experts monitoring the mission on commentating on what they see. They could come to understand that these genetic storage containers contain the life and genetic information of dozens (or even hundreds) of other worlds, stored and collected like some sort of galactic museum. The varied troops in their armies are the dominant species from their respective planets, cured and “uplifted” by the Elders to assist them in their universal search to protect and save all life they come across. Then, you could stumble upon the laboratories where it’s clear that this philanthropic endeavour isn’t just misguided benevolence but also a pressing need for them to cure their own biological failings. You could have some interesting “boss fights” here where X-Com can kill some of their failed attempts at creating a suitable form to hold them. Think psychic chryssalids and the possibilities start to open up immediately. After killing several Avatars and the facility is collapsing, maybe then one Elder would reach out and tragically explain their hubris and misguided attempts as their work crumbles around them.

You have a better narrative that can explore a specific contained theme that way. Also, it doesn’t beholden you to any sort of power creep in your franchise. The next X-Com game can be something entirely different. Instead of being invaded by these arrogant Elders, you could reset the world have it be Cthulu monsters or whatever else imaginable. In this way, each instalment would be a self contained story and the varied game play changes can easily be explained that way. As it is now, I don’t know how Firaxis will address the fact that you’ve already researched tons of advanced technologies which you won’t have in the sequel. They skirted that issue this time by declaring the first one “didn’t actually occur.”

But unless they plan on doing that every time (and given their obvious foreshadowing at the end indicates otherwise), they’re going to have to come up with ever increasingly contrived explanations or completely rework a significant portion of the game. And I don’t envy either of those options.

Also, I’d really like for one to have a story that didn’t completely suck. Not that it’s super important. But it’d be nice.

Welcome Back, Commander Part 1

Here’s something exciting and new. An actually timely review! What a novelty.

So, I’ve been following Derek’s lead in not purchasing games new any more. Video games occupy an odd place in the entertainment industry. They’re one of the most expensive compared to a movie, concert or book. On the other hand, you’re going to get more time out of them and their cost/hour ratio is a lot better than a film. However, unlike the other mediums, video games have a very short shelf life. Basically, the industry really only cares about a game’s first three month release window. After that, it’s essentially dead to them.

This typically translates into enormous price drops before the game is even a year old. By the time a movie is releasing to video and looking to extract almost double the cost of a ticket from its audience, games are racing to the bottom in terms of price trying desperately to make a few last minute sales. This “wait to purchase” mentality is only reinforced by the fact that companies will release expansions or additional content at a premium that, after a year or two, will be bundled then discounted for less than the original game will discount (I hate you Bethesda).

So, if you’re patient, you can generally get a product which the creator and publisher values around $110 for less than $10. Thus, I have a tendency for viewing things late for the obvious cost effectiveness reasons. Also, by the time I actually get around to many games, I’ll have upgraded my computer to be able to run them at max settings and the gaming community usually has added additional modifications and add-ons themselves to drastically increase the enjoyment of the product.

Well, this time I broke the trend. I bought X-Com 2 new. And I don’t regret it one bit.

Screen shots taken by me. So suck it!

X-Com 2 belongs to Firaxis and 2k Games.

I knew lead up to its release I was going to get X-Com 2 on release. All the press and announcements from Firaxis were pressing all the right buttons. Their prior release, a reboot of the UFO Defence game that I never played but Derek loved so he vowed never to touch anything so pure and blessed that had been soiled by AAA hands, I enjoyed immensely. Their expansion pack–Enemy Within–was even more fantastic. The problem with the game wasn’t in its gameplay but in its maps. Due to a number of unfortunate reasons, X-Com: Enemy Unknown released with about twenty or so pre-fabricated maps on which every tactical, squad-based battle took place. After several playthroughs of the game, each map became incredibly predictable and the game itself grew rather dry.

So what was Firaxis’ plan? They announced that not only would the sequel feature procedurally generated maps but they would also release a bunch of development tools to the community to allow easy modifying of the game’s content. This would allow ambitious modders the opportunity to add their own “cells” to the map generator for a even greater variety of locations and zones in which to murder a bunch of invading aliens.

They could have just done that for the X-Com formula and I would have been there Day 1 for the game.

They didn’t, however, and I haven’t seen this much care put into a sequel since… well… the last Civilization game was released. And, when compared to Firaxis’ other headlining franchise, I can’t help but feel that X-Com 2 somehow comes out the better.

But before we get into the meat and potatoes, let’s discuss what X-Com is.

X-Com is a strategy game that sees the player leading a clandestine organization tasked with safeguarding earth from the machinations of an invading alien force. The game plays over several strategic layers. Primarily, the player must lead his forces in battle against the aliens in covert missions. In the first game, these manifest as rescue missions where X-Com had to escort certain individuals to safety, defuse bombs or thwart abductions the aliens were conducting or protect cities being ravaged by outright genocide missions the aliens pursued in order to sow fear and confusion. At this level, the player leads his troops over a grid based map alternating turns between her and the aliens trying to wipe the other out first or complete objectives.

In order to match the alien’s superior technology, the second layer of the game is managing X-Com’s resources and deciding where and how to prepare your troops for bloody conflict. The primary method of this resource management is directing your science department’s research as you develop more advanced weaponry and armour. However, research is not conducted in isolation and the player needs to develop their base in order to accelerate research times or put into practice laboratories and other specialized rooms unlocked by new discoveries.

However, none of this development is cheap and we arrive at the final strategic layer of X-Com. Here, the player needs to manage and safeguard his income. In the first game, the world (represented by about twelve prominent countries) provided funding for the X-Com project. However, as the alien invasion wore on, these participating countries would start to lose faith in the project. Should the player not protect each nation to a satisfactory degree, the participating member could withdraw his support and finances, turning the world map into an ominous expanding cloud of red pixalated doom. To prevent this, the player had to maintain satellite coverage and fend off any invading UFOs.

2016-02-08_00001

Look upon the (customizable) faces of humanity’s saviours!

So, there were a number of different interconnected systems that asked the player to juggle a lot of decisions. Should you send your troops on this very difficult abduction mission? You haven’t researched the next tier of weapons so your damage is low against the projected enemy forces. However, the country being threatened is in danger of withdrawing their support and they’re currently providing you scientists at the end of every month that help speed up the research for those very weapons that you desperately need. A decision at one strategic layer can have a cascading impact across all others that puts a tax on your resources and makes difficult each following decision the player faces.

It was a wonderful blend, so much so that the reboot X-Com game did far better than the first person shooter version–which was the project that 2k Games originally obtained the IP to make. X-Com: Enemy Unknown was quite the surprise at the time of release. It was hard and uncompromising when games were still being pushed to be accessible and instantly gratifying. It was a turn based strategy in an era where most companies still saw shooters as the only genre worth pursuing. And against expectations, X-Com: Enemy Unknown succeeded.

X-Com 2, thankfully, stays pretty close to form. It is a refinement of the first game. It adds several quality of life changes while still being recognizable in its tri-layered play. However, the developers were clever in creating the sequel. Instead of setting the game immediately after the events of the first, they brazenly announced that X-Com 2 would occur in a future where the player had failed and the aliens took over. This would be a world unrecognizable to X-Com: Enemy Unknown players. Here, the X-Com project is little more than a resistance cell, unfunded and scrambling from country to country trying to avoid capture and detainment from the alien force in charge. This Advent organization runs earth, congregating humanity into concentrated city centres and violently detaining any and all who oppose their directives.

With a change in position came important changes in play. Now, instead of protecting countries from the aliens, the player must convince far flung rebel cells to assist in overthrowing the tyrannical regime. The player must build radio lines to connect with different areas, contact resistance cells and then defend these places when Advent invariably locates and tries to hunt them down. In return, X-Com is awarded the ubiquitous “supplies” that can be used to purchase just about anything though are far more controlled in generation.

Instead of having a stationary base which the player is excavating further and further into the ground, X-Com now operates from a mobile flying fortress. There’s still a building component to it but this time the layout is far less relevant than figuring out how to staff all your rooms and prioritizing what needs to be be constructed in what order. It feels more like a worker management section as you juggle engineers between clearing wreckage, building rooms and manning stations. Unfortunately, the research portion is a little bare bones. Scientists basically reduce research time which is lacklustre compared to all the things you can do with engineers. I definitely find myself scouring the map for engineers and being disappointed whenever I’m awarded with some four-eyed nerd to just sit around with Dr. Tygan.

But, wow, is the combat good. Which is important because you do a lot of it. The classes feel very defined and the skill trees present two distinct archetypes. I find it really hard to field my operatives in missions. I just want to take everyone. Invariably the skill builds I tend towards lean on effectiveness over fun. For instance, the gunslinger sharpshooter is amazingly entertaining being able to throw out three or more pistol shots in a turn. Unfortunately, the short range on his shots means I either rush him up with the rest of my force than use him as long range ordinance. And if I’m going to be up in the grills of my enemies, the damage output of the pistol doesn’t compare to a critical build on my ranger. I also find that having a fifth (or sixth) soldier fighting for good cover on the front line just doesn’t compare to a camped sniper in a tower far from retaliation and laying down round after round of precision shooting.

The ranger is my least favourite class. The sword is great at the start of the game when enemies are few and accuracy on your soldiers is terrible. But soon the shotgun gets pretty deadly and the sword falls pretty fast in regards to damage. The enemies begin to accrue high health pools and armour values which criticals can offset but swords just kind of… fail. And the scout tree gives a lot of utility towards… well… scouting. It’s not the sexiest of roles but it helps to locate where the aliens are and, in a pinch, the ranger can serve as a quick assassin who runs up and loads a stupid digital glitchy woman in the face with a whole payload of lead.

Grenadiers are just as good as ever. I want to run a support grenadier with all the suppression and holo-targeting of the X-Com of old but suppression seems to do all of nothing and holo-targeting pales in comparison to all the destruction of a fully ordinance based grenadier. For another major change in X-Com 2 is not only fun and dynamic but really important. Environmental destruction has been ramped up to where just about anything can be destroyed. Need a quick escape from a heavily armed Advent complex? Lob a grenade at the closest wall and book it as fast as you can. And there’s something very rewarding about bombing the roof out beneath the feet (tail?) of an enemy viper and watching their dodging nonsense break every bone in their miserable, scaly body on the landing.

Then there’s the specialist. It’s the old support class ramped up by a thousand. The gremlin let’s the specialist not only hack at a distance (really important at the start where you might end up wasting a lot of turns trying to get to the enemy and running dangerously close to losing the objective) but also gives the ability to zap foes or heal allies at a distance. Both the assured damage from a gremlin charge and the long distance triage can save lives. With only six slots and five very useful classes, it’s tough deciding who to double up. An additional grenadier gives a lot of area damage and cover destruction but I almost always end up taking both my medic and combat hacker.

There's lots of these small but amazing little touches like having your own soldiers on the menu backgrounds.

There’s lots of these small but amazing little touches like having your own soldiers on the menu backgrounds.

Then there’s the psionic operative. They’re a little different in that you don’t level them up by killing aliens but by shoving them in a tube and having them do push-ups. On one hand, it’s nice that you can level up a soldier without fighting over alien experience but I find it hard to justify their place on my roster since any kills they get is lost experience to my other troops and any injury they incur is time they aren’t training. On the other hand, their abilities are incredible. They have a slew of abilities that do damage regardless of armour or cover. And they have really strong support abilities that can give your troops additional attacks or immunity to mind control.

But classes aren’t the only tough decision. Your engineers can create a slew of really powerful weapons that are really hard to leave behind. And yet, you’re limited in what you can take with you. Between skull jacks, med kits, a host of varied by powerful grenades and armours and it’s tough outfitting your guys for battle. Not to mention you have to develop these weapons which requires time and engineers. It’s a lot of good choices without any seeming outright better than others. And I really like how the game puts pressure on you to prioritize through the Avatar project instead of dragging your heels to get everything you want. I’ll also really quickly say that, while some don’t like the turn limit on missions, I’m a huge fan of them and how they change up your tactics and priorities.

It’s not all good news, however. I should comment on the performance issues. The game requires some fiddling with settings to get it running decently (read: turn off vsync), the loading times are pretty lengthy and there’s a bunch of bugs. I wouldn’t dare try an ironman run. I’ve had two crashes to desktop and a handful of other smaller bugs: ruined cars exploding, hackers taking damage from successful hacks or hacks by other specialists, that sort of thing. If those things are deal breakers then it’s probably best to hold off for several months until this gets ironed out. The game is still playable with these issues and still fantastic regardless.

Finally, the choice to place this after a failed defence in the future was brilliant. That they can use a single, unified tile set for every city explained through their story is genius. The redesigns for the alien forces not only unifies them better but makes them far more visually intimidating as well. Incorporating EXALT essentially as the low level grunts who can scale later in the game with better weapons and armour was also very clever. It’s impressive how one concept can bleed through the rest of the design and make everything stronger for it.

It’s a pity, then, how they ended it all…

2016-02-08_00011

The Good Bad

Making a movie is difficult. Making a good movie is really difficulty. And making a good “bad movie” is an art in-of-itself.

This past weekend was the Great Digital Film Festival which, I can only assume, was an initiative started by Cineplex Odeon Cinema to try and shore up some extra sales during that post Christmas lull where nothing but movies expected to die are released and most the populace is either recovering from holiday feast induced comas or are desperately trying to keep to their optimistic New Year’s resolutions until the end of the month when it’ll seem less pathetic when they invariably give them up.

How’s that for an opening sentence?

The Digital Film festival is filled with old cult classics–presumably because cult hits are the only type of film apt to still draw viewers years or even decades after release. I’m sure there’s some sort of commentary somewhere in there about the disposable entertainment of our generation and how art is meant to be immediately consumed and forgotten in an never ending pursuit of the latest big releases from our dominant industry overlords. We’re on the precipice here for some good, old fashioned futuristic dystopia with the way our tastes are dictated to us but, alas, this is probably just a moment of “old man yells at clouds.”

Mostly, I want to say that I saw Big Trouble in Little China this weekend. And I had fun.

Accessed from http://bitterempire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/big-trouble-in-little-china.jpg

Big Trouble in Little China belongs to John Carpenter, 20th Century Fox, SLM Production Company and many more.

Yes, me. Yes, fun. It was as unexpected an event as world peace or a tasty English meal. Now this isn’t to say Big Trouble is a fantastic movie that everyone must see and totally a forgotten masterpiece that changes lives. It’s stupid fun but not the sort of “stupid fun” that I complain about in pretty much every other single release that hits the screens.

See, Big Trouble in Little China is a “bad movie.” By all reasonable measurements, it fails in every category worth discussing. It has undeveloped characters. It has a nonsensical plot fill with enormous holes. It has terrible special effects and awful cinematography. Its dialogue is oft-times incomprehensible. But unlike so many other movies, this is done intentionally. This was a beast of a movie made solely to be “bad.” And it is. And it’s great.

It reminds me of the type of comedy movie that I enjoyed as a child (and given the age of the movie itself–released in 1986–it’s probably made in that style). I’m thinking of the Leslie Nielsen pictures of yesteryear. The Airplanes and Naked Guns and whatnot. These movies were all parodies, deriving their humour by poking fun at the faults or cliches of the genres they spoofed. Then you have the Mel Brooks films which also steer into parody but also have a strong farcical component to them. I mean, one of Mel Brooks recurring jokes is having production elements slip into the action on the screen, whether it’s a boom microphone breaking a window interrupting Maid Marian’s song in Robin Hood: Men in Tights or Dark Helmet accidentally cutting down a cameraman during a mock lightsabre battle in Space Balls.

It’s a style of comedy that I haven’t really seen much nowadays. You could argue that Spy was a modern attempt at that parody/farcical style but it leaned far too much on gross humour and the standard “fat person falls down” that’s rampant. And it’s stupid but it’s not the same kind of stupid. That may be a strange claim to make but it’s true. There’s an air of “Screw it, let’s just do this,” in Big Trouble. It’s not dumb because the creator’s couldn’t do better. It’s dumb because it’s silly, fun and weird. I mean, I have no other explanation for the weird beholder monster or ugly Chewbacca that show up with little to no explanation in the movie. It shoots for the unexpected without trying to strike at shock value humour.

There’s a deliberateness that doesn’t come off as artificial. It feels like the creators set out to specifically make a bad movie, spoofing the elements that plague poorly created works much like Mel Brooks spoofs the technical gaffs of production. It’s in the little details, like villainous Lo Pan’s first name being David even though he’s depicted as an ancient Chinese sorcerer. Or Miao Yin arrives with a big box of baking powder. And, of course, there’s the bigger detail that Kurt Russell spends much of the action either knocked out, trapped under bodies, stuck in wheelchairs or chasing after knives. Course, he’s ostensibly only in the film because the villains stole his truck for no apparent reason other than, I presume, Lo Pan needed a honeymoon vehicle.

And yet, the strangest thing about Big Trouble in Little China is that somehow a movie thirty years old somehow bucks a lot of the issues prominent in our media now. Its female characters, while ostensibly serving as damsels in distress, end up getting involved in a number of rescue attempts and action. And their uselessness in combat is negligible given the plethora of female villains that the protagonists have to combat. Since, you know, everyone in China knows kung fu and the movie is most certainly happy to fall into Wuxia tropes at the drop of a hat. And outside of the principle male and female role, near everyone else is a minority. And while the narrative frame is to try and put the focus on Jack Burton and Gracie Law, the action and story is most assuredly set around Wang Chi and Miao Yin. Perhaps its because comedies aren’t expected to hold to conventions.

Accessed from http://cdn.hitfix.com/photos/6057863/Big_Trouble_In_Little_China_remake_news_article_story_large.jpgBut there’s a delicate balance in making a good “bad movie.” And while you can have some skill in doing so, like John Carpenter, you can also be completely clueless so long as you’re earnest.

I couldn’t help but draw some comparisons between Big Trouble in Little China and The Room of Tommy Wiseau fame. Both are pretty nonsensical, with perhaps The Room maintaining even less coherency than Big Trouble in Little China. And that’s without the aid of lightning riding martial artists or a man whose soul looks like a creepy, black haired Ronald McDonald. Whereas there’s so much deliberate shoddy work in Big Trouble, Wiseau addresses his film with all the earnestness and solemnity of an actual drama. You can tell that John Carpenter is in on the joke and yet he is still able to make you shake your head and leave you guessing where he’s going next. Wiseau, however, isn’t aware of any joke and the complete fumbling of his film is near an exact copy of everything that Big Trouble is mocking. The characters, narrative and pacing is so poorly done that you, as the audience, can’t help but laugh. In a sense, the fun of The Room is mean spirited but I can’t feel bad about it. First, The Room is really bad. Second, Tommy Wiseau is perhaps far more famous than he has any right to be. Finally, The Room is entertaining even if it’s not in the manner it wanted.

So, to make a good bad movie, you need to either be entirely clueless and talentless without the self recognition to realize you need improvement or you need to actually possess the skill to appear as if you don’t. Otherwise, you’re just making a bad movie and while that may be just as much work, it’s significantly less fun.

In short, I had fun with Big Trouble in Little China. On the other hand, I’ve just discovered that they’re going to make a reboot of this movie and now I’m back to being sad about the empty hearted consumerism of modern entertainment.

Forged in Blood – Book Review

Image from the internet of the book cover.

Image from the internet of the book cover.

The Emperor’s Edge series is seven books long – sort of. Book six was split into two books, literally called Forged in Blood I and Forged in Blood II. Of course, then the author, Lindsay Buroker, returned to the world and characters with at least two more books, but they are not part of the main series arc.

I want to start by saying that I really liked the Emperor’s Edge series. I think the writing and in particular the characters were really strong. I was fond of the way Buroker dealt with sexism in the world. Yes, there was a role for women. Unlike so many stories that have oppressed females tied to hearth and home, women’s role was that of businesswomen. They were the owners and managers of companies. The main villainous female wanted to create some powerful bank that would rule the world through its economy! While women are not part of the military base, a significant exclusion for a culture based around fighting and war, they were part of the city’s law-enforcement (granted that was a recent development in the world). I liked the way the author dealt with racism with her use of other cultures in that world.

While many would argue the dialogue used by the characters is not authentic to everyday speech, I would say: excellent! Have you listened to people talk to each other? It usually very boring and highly repetitive. Fortunately the author was far more creative in her use of language. The expletives may be a bit silly at times, but overall I really liked the character’s speech patterns. I enjoyed the witty, fast-paced banter. I actually liked that the author used words even I am not familiar with. I think using a bigger vocabulary than your audience does is a positive attribute. The words are easily understood through context and they have the potential to expand the vocab of the reader (or not as the reader chooses).

Most importantly I really liked the characters. Amaranthe, our feisty female lead was the only voice that was the same throughout the entire series. Buroker made an excellent decision to have the second voice in each book a different important character, a member of Amaranthe’s group of misfits. The different perspectives provided an engaging second window into the characters. It made for a very interesting read as we dealt with different perspectives and side quests.

P1050593That said, there is much of the world I didn’t like. I really am not a fan of the alien technology. I cannot say way, other than it feels so foreign (hehe, alien – get it!?) and disconnected from the rest of the world. I also am not a fan of the magic. They talk about it as though it is a skill, a Science, to be learned. Yet at the same time you seem to be either born with this ability or not. Further, magic can do anything it is seemingly limitless. Perhaps it is this lack of clear limitations to the magic and how it works that rubs me the wrong way. Or perhaps I am too akin to the Turgonians and their anti-magic prejudices. While I may not be able to articulate my dislike for the magic in this otherwise interesting, steampunk world, I was not a fan.

I suspect that my disinclination for the magic and aliens is related to the apparent power creep that happened over the series. As the heroes got stronger, the author felt the need to have bigger and scarier villains. Hence, the incongruous use of alien technology (the aliens have been gone for 50 000 years – the vast amount of time did not help endear me to these ancient space going peoples) and unrefined magic systems. Yes, it made the opponents more deadly, but was that really necessary?

P1050611While I liked the base concept of the last two books, I found the story steps more clichéd and less interesting to read than the earlier books. I feel that these last two books suffered from too much trying to happen. There was a lot of political manoeuvring and downright intimidation. Even the author struggled to find ways for our lovable band of misfits to stay relevant in the dramatically changing political landscape.

Further the introduction of Starcrest and his family, clearly characters from another story in the same world, also pulled attention away from the main caste. It was rather late in the series (which was in theory wrapping up) to have new faced shoved in taking centre stage. I have not read the other books related to Starcrest and his wife, so I was not inclined to love their ruthless inclusion into the rest of the story. I am sure their introduction could have been handled with a bit more tact.

P1050593If nothing else, if the author really wanted to finish on such a grand massive war stage, then don’t force the team together for smaller side quests. Have them split up and integrated into the larger fight. Instead, we had some strange struggle between our familiar core of main characters, bouncing about rather haphazardly, and this revolutionary plot occurring at the same time. It was messy. As a result, the author created smaller problems for our loveable main heroes to overcome. Unfortunately, mind controlling the assassin was silly. Blaming and burying Amaranthe in guilt for disastrous results of events largely outside her control was a bit forced. Books death would have been predictable, if I had been thinking about it in any way. Really, what other character could you kill off by the wise, old man; the voice of learning, experience, and sage advice? He is expendable for that clichéd emotional pull at the end to show that even our noble heroes must make the ultimate sacrifice (with one of the more tangential character’s deaths). When the rest of the series had felt so new and engage, the end was a trifle flat.

Conclusion to this seven book journey: I liked it. Even with all the flaws at the end, I thought it was fun, highly enjoyable read. I prefer earlier books to the later ones. This is largely because the earlier books have less alien technology and I can more easily ignore the magic. The later books rely too heavily on both these elements for my tastes. But the characters are compelling and strongly written. I would recommend the series, at least to the conclusion of the main arc. I am not yet convinced revisiting the world was the best choice, or one that will result in me getting the books.

The Returner

I see my sister has started posting. Perhaps the guilt was starting to get a bit much for her. I mean, it had been almost two whole months since she decided to place something on our little piece of the Interwebz.

Still doing a lot better than Derek, however. Apparently, he’s too busy running doomsday cults and trying to summon great Elder Ones to end Earth and all existence in a maddening song of death and delirium. But that’s fine. I got to see him and as a reward for trekking to his distant and damp apartment, he paid for a viewing of Oscar nominated and likely winner Leonardo DiCaprio’s The Revenant.

So here is my movie review:

It’s ok.

Yup, that’s it. Just ok. I’ve seen worse. I’ve seen better. DiCaprio isn’t the best actor in the film unless you consider lots of heavy panting noteworthy acting. Tom Hardy was quite good, however, and demonstrated a vastly different range of skill portraying the cowardly and inconsistent Fitzpatrick. Though billed as a “white man gets revenge flick for the death of his native family” the film is actually a “see North America beat the crap out of DiCaprio and him trying to eat every living thing in response” film. There’s light characterization, little plot between the three overlapping but ultimately shallow narratives and a bunch of poor decisions made by the principal actors in order for the story to move along.

Accessed from http://www.ew.com/article/2015/10/24/revenant-poster-leonardo-dicaprio

The Revenant, its images and all associated rights belong to Alejandro G. Inarritu, 20th Century Fox and whoever else.

It’s pretty, though. Not sure it justified the larger screen but there are plenty of moments you can forget you’re watching a movie desperately trying to win an Oscar and think you’ve stumbled across David Attenborough’s fevered dreams of the Secret Life of North American Fauna While on Crack. Though, I’m sure that mountain of elk skulls is meant to be artistic or symbolic or something.

The movie is simple, brutish and harsh which I suppose was the goal in order to communicate how much it sucked being a fur trapper on the edges of colonial America. There’s probably some other dialogue meant to occur that, beyond the confines of civilization, man just sorts of reverts to a barbaric and violent state of nature but that’s such a boring, tired and ultimately unfounded argument that I’m not going to indulge it any further. At the very least, I can tell you that the production crew were very meticulous in making sure their representation of fur traders and the frontier was accurate. I say this with confidence because Kait keeps dragging me to pioneer villages and everything I’ve learned from Fort William Historical Park to The Fort Museum in Fort Macleod was front and centre on screen.

Anyway, I don’t wish to go into the finer merits and demerits of the film. I’d rather complain about the Oscars.

Mostly, I don’t understand the appeal of the awards show. I know there’s been a large discourse over the institution and its implications for the entertainment industry in general in regards to representation. It’s a worthy conversation and one where the issues are pretty plain to see. Course, with such huge gobs of money involved, change will no doubt be slow and painful even as television starts making greater strides to prove that widely held truisms simply aren’t based on reality. Look at Marvel’s Agent Carter. There’s a show that’s presumably doing well, lead by a prominent female protagonist and (second season at least) has a minority co-star and love interest. Granted, you can see that in the new Star Wars too.

Anyway, I don’t want to bang on the social justice drum. I mostly want to express how baffling I find people’s obsession with the Oscars is in general. I simply do not understand the appeal. I mean, it’s an awards show. I don’t get why I should care. I especially don’t understand why I should care when the awards are doled out in an arbitrary fashion following the tastes and judgements of unnamed individuals who never need justify or provide oversight for their decisions. At least something like the People’s Choice Awards involves public polling to provide some sort of attachment for the viewership and the results.

But not the Oscars. No, their arbitrariness is meant to be accepted. It’s meant to be enjoyed.

I suppose it’s a testament to the entertainment industry that they can turn their own industry awards into a public spectacle that lots of people tune into and discuss fervently. You won’t find co-workers gathered around the water cooler who have obsessively tuned into the Queen’s Award for Enterprise to vehemently argue how Bonds Limited was robbed in the International Trade (Export) category in 2010.  And yet, you’re practically a philistine if you haven’t some horse in the race for Best Picture or haven’t heard of Spotlight let alone seen it. There’s tons of articles covering the politics of the Oscars and how actors or films will be rewarded not for the quality of their entry but as a sort of “pity award” for being ignored prior until the individuals had established their careers. When talking about likely winners, people are more likely to debate whether someone is too young or if the award should go to the guy who has been nominated six times and still hasn’t won rather than whether their specific performance deserves it or not.

Accessed from http://d2ciprw05cjhos.cloudfront.net/files/v3/styles/gs_large/public/images/15/12/duane_howard_0.jpg?itok=N0d5hqsaThis should probably sound familiar, given the opening of this rant. I wouldn’t be surprised if DiCaprio wins for his nomination despite, as I said, his acting in this movie boils down to learning about twenty lines then rolling around in dirt for an hour and a half. People will debate how this is such a great injustice. People will argue how the films nominated don’t deserve their recognition when other films were snubbed.

But for me, I think it’s stranger that we’re talking about this. Unless you were involved in the production itself or are cheering for a family member, I simply don’t understand why you’d care. It’s the same reason why I never understood the Spike sponsored Video Game Awards. My life is literally unaffected whether The Revenant wins best picture or Fallout 4 continues to be loved by critics and fans despite being one of Bethesda’s worse products in recent years. Of all the awards in all the industries, why is it people are so interested in the Academy’s movie awards?

I don’t mean this to ruin anyone’s fun or detract from the conversation regarding its process people wish to hold. I am merely perplexed and can’t help but wonder why there’s such public involvement in this sector and why no one has been able to harness that involvement to improve it for the better.

And why can the average person riddle off all the Oscar Best Actor nominees but not name a single Nobel Prize winner for the same year? Where have our priorities gone?